Review by Hugh Jarss….
The Cyprus Mail reported that Archbishop Chrysostomos, in his Easter Sunday message, compared the response of Turkey, in 1974, to the invasion of Cyprus by Greece and the implementation of its Iphestos plan, to liquidate the entire Turkish Cypriot population, as being equivalent to the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. He also commented that, despite uninterrupted peace between the two sides since 1974, it was obvious that Turkey intended to occupy the whole of Cyprus.
In relation to the reopening of Maraş, the Archbishop claimed that the bad weather on the day of President Erdogan’s visit was divine providence. In closing his Easter message the Archbishop compared the resurrection of Christ following the crucifixion to the expected reunification of Cyprus as a Cypriot Hellenic state.
As a truly honest expression of the best Orthodox Christian principles, the Archbishop comes second only to Vladimir Putin.
Statement by the TRNC Ministry of Foreign Affairs regarding the statement of the Greek Cypriot Archbishop
We condemn the statement by the Greek Archbishop on the occasion of Easter which incites the hatred of the Greek Cypriot Orthodox Church towards the Turkish Cypriot People and Turkey from past to present.
The Greek Archbishop’s attempt to link the situation in Cyprus with Russia’s attack on Ukraine is nothing but concealing the disgrace that the Greek side left its mark on history. The Archbishopric of the Greek Orthodox Church is one of the main responsible parties of the atrocities that the Turkish Cypriot People had suffered for years. It is also in our memories that the Archbishopric, which has wielded its power to influence the Greek political elite in the past and today, forced the Turkish Cypriot People to live under the threat of death and genocide between 1963 and 1974 in the ghettos corresponding to only three percent of the island.
Let alone not feel embarrassed from what the Enosis obsession of the Greek Cypriot side has caused, the Greek Archbishop also does not hide the fact that he perceives the island as an “Hellenic island”. It is not surprising for an institution, as the flag-bearer of Enosis, considering the Turkish Cypriot People as a minority, to openly declare that the island is a “Hellenic island”.
If Turkey had not intervened in the island in 1974 following the coup carried out by Greece and declaration of Enosis, the genocide would have continued in pursuance of the dream of uniting the island to Greece until there was not a single Turkish Cypriot left on the island. The 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation, which took place from the rights deriving from the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee and upon the calls of the Turkish Cypriot People, has no link whatsoever with the situation in Ukraine, either legally or morally.
Today, there are two Peoples living side by side in two separate States on the island. The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus is the only State that has the right to have a say regarding the future of the territory under its sovereignty, including the fenced-off area of Maraş. The only way to move the two sides forward on the island is through the cooperation of the two States on the island on the basis of good neighbourly relations.
Source: TRNC Public Information Office.